I will use 1 light sensor to detect light and two motors for the movement. Therefore at least 3 neurons are needed: 1 sensor neuron, 2 motor neurons. Are three neurons enough? I guess probably not for an efficient light finder. To find the light source the robot should know the change of light intensity. It might be necessary to include more interneurons for this function.
During the past few months I have read quite a few papers in neural science to gain some inspiration from the real neural systems. Some of which are about c. elegans. Even though I expected for c. elegans to survive it should do something similar like finding the light I was still a bit surprised to read that the neural network the real c. elegans used could be directly applied on my NXT robot! The only difference is c.~elegans is more interested chemicals rather than light, so light intensity is replaced by chemical concentration for c. elegans. Other than this everything is almost the same. I found the following facts about c. elegans' chemotaxis:
- It only uses 1 sensor neuron.
- Effectively it uses 2 motor neuros to control the left and right side of the muscles.
Neurocircuits it might be using has been proposed, for example Eduardo Izquierdo used a genetical algorithm to find some working minimal neural networks (The Journal of Neuroscience, September 29, 2010 • 30(39):12908 –12917); I especially like the work by T. C. Ferree et al. Indeed ten years ago, they have done exactly the same thing I want to do now: use the neural network to control the robot to find light! Here is their paper "Robust spatial navigation in a robot inspired by chemotaxis in c. elegans". Therefore as the first step I will simply repeat their work based on NXTCamel. The photo below is their modeling of the car from the paper. NXTCamel is designed to have a equivalent driving system as their model.